WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...

cleaner · Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 36

Just updated to the latest build and now some of my hosts are comming back with that error message. In the debug log the only thing the oid returns is U. It seems that some of the snmp stuff is screwed up. Anyone see this before?

01/12/2006 11:15:49 AM - SYSTEM STATS: Time:46.9295 Method:cactid Processes:3 Threads:4 Hosts:58 HostsPerProcess:20 DataSources:913 RRDsProcessed:647
01/12/2006 11:15:43 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[382] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:43 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[383] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:43 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[381] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:37 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[66] DS[682] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:37 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[66] DS[683] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:37 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[66] DS[681] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:25 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[62] DS[635] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:25 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[62] DS[634] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:17 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[321] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:17 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[320] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:12 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[34] DS[342] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 11:15:12 AM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[34] DS[347] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...

gandalf · Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:36 pm Post subject:

Please switch Logging Level to DEBUG and post again. Is it always the same OID that fails?
Reinhard

cleaner · Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 36

Heres a couple, let me know if you need more info.

01/12/2006 03:20:18 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[329] SNMP: v2: 172.16.1.33, dsname: traffic_in, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.33554436, value: 5
01/12/2006 03:20:18 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[329] SNMP: v2: 172.16.1.33, dsname: traffic_out, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16.33554436, value: 41
01/12/2006 03:20:18 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[320] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 03:20:18 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[320] SNMP: v2: 172.16.1.33, dsname: users, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.1.5.0, value: U
01/12/2006 03:20:18 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[321] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 03:20:18 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[32] DS[321] SNMP: v2: 172.16.1.33, dsname: proc, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.1.6.0, value: U

01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[396] SNMP: v1: 172.16.1.150, dsname: traffic_out, oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16.4, value: 1174069237
01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[381] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[381] SNMP: v1: 172.16.1.150, dsname: load_1min, oid: .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.1, value: U
01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[383] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[383] SNMP: v1: 172.16.1.150, dsname: load_5min, oid: .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.2, value: U
01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[382] WARNING: Result from SNMP not valid. Partial Result: ...
01/12/2006 03:20:38 PM - CACTID: Poller[0] Host[36] DS[382] SNMP: v1: 172.16.1.150, dsname: load_15min, oid: .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.3, value: U

gandalf · Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:58 pm Post subject:

Thanks for posting this. Please try to snmpwalk against those host/OIDs from command line. And please have a couple of runs with cmd.php instead of cactid and notice, whether there's any difference.
Reinhard

paulbeard206 · Cacti User Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 106

gandalf · Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:30 am Post subject:

As to cactid, there are some issues. But I'm not sure that they do relate to your problem. Personally, I'd like to recommend at least the f1 release. cactid-0.8.6g was released lately. It appears that problem do occur with CPU and User info. As I asked before, please snmpwalk against those from cli and post your findings. This would be of importance for further debugging
Reinhard

paulbeard206 · Cacti User Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 106

gandalf · Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:56 pm Post subject:

Sorry for having been imprecise. But you log shows

jpimentel · Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 38

Just glanced at the title of the post. I had the same error in my logs when I hade datasources assigned to none. When I removed them I stopped seeing the error. I did not have time to read entire post, so ignore if it has already been tried.

knobdy · Cacti User Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 495

How do you find those?

I've deleted lots of graphs - saving the data sources for fear of losing data used by other graphs (since I'm not as up on how cacti uses its resource files as I ought to be)... and I get LOTS of these messages in my log file (though, since everything generally works, I don't pay much attention).

didjou · Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 1

I have this problem too,

It's seems to be in the result of my router :

qos-box:/ # snmpwalk -v1 -c public 10.0.0.138 .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.102
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifInOctets.102 = Counter32: 84831244

There are no problems ... but cacti seems to detect the space (between "Counter32:" and "84831244". According to function.php (validate_result())
a space or ":" or "!" is concidered like an error ...

i do an explode(" ",$output) when i detect a space ... all goes fine now

networkfupa · Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 26

GeneralMandible · Joined: 21 Nov 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Belgrade, MT

gandalf · Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:54 am Post subject:

This is a very old post. This bug has since long been fixed. Of course, there may be a different issue by now
Reinhard