|
|
| Author |
Message |
maxclark
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:32 pm Post subject: Thank You |
|
|
| Thanks for posting this.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fmangeant Cacti Guru User
Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 2325 Location: Sophia-Antipolis, France
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Reinhard !
I used to modify RRAs juste after installing Cacti, but I forgot to do so on my secondary server. A few minutes after running the script, RRD files were at the desired size
BTW, this thread should be made sticky...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mokeybrains
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 38 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:57 am Post subject: resize ... with shrink? |
|
|
I resized a bunch or RRAs. my test one (which I did first and verified) I accidentally resized twice and 'grew' it twice. Is there an easy way to shrink the RRA? Feature request for next resize.pl version!
Also, RE: wanting to see fine granularity a year ago: that's absurd, no one should be looking that far back. Move on to the future!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gandalf Developer
Joined: 02 Dec 2004 Posts: 12604 Location: Muenster, Germany
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: resize ... with shrink? |
|
|
| mokeybrains wrote: | | I resized a bunch or RRAs. my test one (which I did first and verified) I accidentally resized twice and 'grew' it twice. Is there an easy way to shrink the RRA? Feature request for next resize.pl version! | To be honest, that should be a question of only a few lines of code. But I never though this would be of any use. Cactitians only like to blow their filesystems
If you need a quick shot: replace GROW by SHRINK in the code and this should do ...
Reinhard
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mokeybrains
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 38 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:57 pm Post subject: Save your disks! |
|
|
Ha! You would think that Cactitians would care about system performance... but then again, load and cpu graphs near 0 are boring.
Attached is a little patch to allow you to us resize to grow or unGrow your RRD files.
The '-G' flag will shrink, while the -g flag will still grow. You can, in a fit of confusion, use them both and the difference of the two will be applied to your RRD file.
| Description: |
| A patch for resize.pl which allows you to SHRINK as well as GROW your RRD files. |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
resize.pl-patch.txt |
| Filesize: |
2.74 KB |
| Downloaded: |
201 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ahuber
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 44 Location: BC, kootenays
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just wanted to mention, ... My rrd's are 32mb, some are 80mbs (depending on how many DS). And they only hold 1 minute resolution for the entire year (365 days)
After reading this post, that's not right, is it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mokeybrains
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 38 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:22 pm Post subject: hard to believe ... |
|
|
I find it hard to believe that anyone would really want to look at any data on a minute granularity from half a year ago. No, I am not trying to bait any one, but really, I monitor 51 devices, and the last thing I need is granularity from a long time ago: it just doesn't help in debugging machines or billing customers...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ahuber
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 44 Location: BC, kootenays
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unfortunatley I agree with you monkey brains. But I'm trying to work out that mistake, by saving my graphs, becuase if it's more than 2 months old data, I only want to see what it averaged over 2 or 4 hours. We do need some granularity to detect trends over the course of 8 to 12 or more months, but not at a minute. I am reading many posts to consolidate, it's kinda hard right now, but I am determined. I don't know how large an rra should be at a per minute over 12 months, does anyone know?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|