Cacti (home)ForumsRepositoryDocumentation
Cacti: offical forums and support  

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in    


be more flexable with oid/regex output in XML files
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cacti Forum Index -> Feature Requests
Author Message
Ragnar



Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 5
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
TheWitness wrote:
Does anyone have a patch? It won't make it into Saturday's release, but...

TheWitness


This only supports output, not input fields, but input fields generally don't have poorly formed mibs, this patch adds an oid_suffix tag to the xml. patched against 0.8.7a

Code:

diff -rup cacti.0.8.7a/lib/utility.php cacti/lib/utility.php
--- cacti.0.8.7a/lib/utility.php        2007-12-11 10:54:13.000000000 -0500
+++ cacti/lib/utility.php       2007-12-11 11:31:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ function update_poller_cache($local_data
                        foreach ($outputs as $output) {
                                if (isset($snmp_queries["fields"]{$output["snmp_field_name"]}["oid"])) {
                                        $oid = $snmp_queries["fields"]{$output["snmp_field_name"]}["oid"] . "." . $data_source["snmp_index"];
+                                       if (isset($snmp_queries["fields"]{$output["snmp_field_name"]}["oid_suffix"])) {
+                                               $oid .= "." . $snmp_queries["fields"]{$output["snmp_field_name"]}["oid_suffix"];
+                                       }
                                }
 
                                if (!empty($oid)) {
Back to top
gandalf
Developer


Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 11294
Location: Muenster, Germany
PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Please show us an XML file which uses this new feature.
Reinhard
Back to top
TheWitness
Developer


Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 9255
Location: MI, USA
PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Once this is well documented, if viable, please direct to open a feature request with the relevant information.

TheWitness
Back to top
gandalf
Developer


Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 11294
Location: Muenster, Germany
PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Oh, I volunteer for this, including docs, for sure. But I first need to understand better.
Reinhard
Back to top
steagu



Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 37
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Just my 2 cents to this feature request thread...

I'm trying to graph Quality of Service (QoS) statistics on a Cisco Device. The SNMP walk for the particular OID i'm graphing (QOSDropPackets in this case) shows the following

SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10101.1.1 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10101.2.1 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10102.1.1 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10102.2.1 = Counter64: 185716
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10103.1.1 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10103.2.1 = Counter64: 127041
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10104.1.1 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10104.2.1 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.189.1.3.2.1.7.10105.1.1 = Counter64: 0




And my index shows:

+ Found item [ifIndex='10101'] index: 10101 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10102'] index: 10102 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10103'] index: 10103 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10104'] index: 10104 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10105'] index: 10105 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10106'] index: 10106 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10107'] index: 10107 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10108'] index: 10108 [from value]
+ Found item [ifIndex='10109'] index: 10109 [from value]

This is from another thread I had open asking for help in graphing this information at http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=24337
Back to top
Ragnar



Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 5
PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
gandalf wrote:
Please show us an XML file which uses this new feature.
Reinhard


Code:

<interface>
        <name>Get MetaSwitch ISUP Signalling Destinations</name>
        <index_order_type>numeric</index_order_type>
        <oid_index>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5</oid_index>

        <oid_index_parse>OID/REGEXP:.*\.1578918\.6\.[0-9]{1,4}\.1\.[0-9]{1,4}\.(.*)$</oid_index_parse>

        <fields>
                <msDN>
                        <name>DN</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>input</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5</oid>
                </msDN>
                <msStatus>
                        <name>Status</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>input</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.52</oid>
                </msStatus>
                <msChansCfgdHighWaterMark>
                        <name>ChansCfgdHighWaterMark</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.9</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msChansCfgdHighWaterMark>
                <msChansInUseCallsHighWaterMark>
                        <name>ChansInUseCallsHighWaterMark</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msChansInUseCallsHighWaterMark>
                <msChansInUseOrigCallsHighWaterMark>
                        <name>ChansInUseOrigCallsHighWaterMark</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.17</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msChansInUseOrigCallsHighWaterMark>
                <msChansInUseTermCallsHighWaterMark>
                        <name>ChansInUseTermCallsHighWaterMark</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.21</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msChansInUseTermCallsHighWaterMark>
                <msCallUsageOrigingCalls>
                        <name>CallUsageOrigingCalls</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.36</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msCallUsageOrigingCalls>
                <msCntTermCallAttsAnswrd>
                        <name>CntTermCallAttsAnswrd</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.41</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msCntTermCallAttsAnswrd>
                <msCntTermCallAttsRejAsBusy>
                        <name>CntTermCallAttsRejAsBusy</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.42</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msCntTermCallAttsRejAsBusy>
                <msCntTermCallAttsNotAnswrd>
                        <name>CntTermCallAttsNotAnswrd</name>
                        <method>walk</method>
                        <source>value</source>
                        <direction>output</direction>
                        <oid>.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.43</oid>
                        <oid_suffix>2</oid_suffix>
                </msCntTermCallAttsNotAnswrd>
        </fields>
</interface>


the problem this solves, is oids formed like:
Code:

# snmpbulkwalk -v2c -cpublic x.x.x.x .1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.1 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.2 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.3 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.4 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.5 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.6 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.7 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54.8 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.1 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.2 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.3 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.4 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.5 = Gauge32: 0
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.6 = Gauge32: 1
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.7 = Gauge32: 1
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49.8 = Gauge32: 1
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.1 = Gauge32: 1
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.2 = Gauge32: 1
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.3 = Gauge32: 1
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.4 = Gauge32: 3
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.5 = Gauge32: 3
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.6 = Gauge32: 3
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.7 = Gauge32: 3
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.786.1.13.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56.8 = Gauge32: 1

where they have a trailing suffix after the index (in this case standing for cur 5min = 1, prev 5min = 2, cur 15 = 3, prev 15 = 4, etc)

The index/input OIDs on the other hand are well formed:
Code:

# snmpbulkwalk -v2c -cpublic x.x.x.x .1.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.48.50.51.52.49.54 = STRING: "xxx2023416"
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.52.56.53.54.57.49 = STRING: "xxx2485691"
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.53.52.56.52.56.56 = STRING: "xxx2548488"
iso.2.826.0.1.1578918.6.1218.1.5.1.7.100.101.102.97.117.108.116.1.10.51.49.55.50.54.52.50.54.48.48 = STRING: "xxx2642600"
Back to top
gandalf
Developer


Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 11294
Location: Muenster, Germany
PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Fine, I already supposed it would work this way. Will try to implement it for next release
Reinhard
Back to top
Syngress



Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 13
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I asked earlier (In this thread) about being about to walk OID's that use a suffix, and having seen the above 'patch' am wondering if this will solve my issue

The problem I have is when I snmpwalk the OID I get the following :-

snmpwalk ps-1.BHM1 -c yyyyy .1.3.6.1.4.1.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.1.1.1 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.1.1.5 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.1.1.60 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.1.1.300 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.5.1.1 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.5.1.5 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.5.1.60 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.5.1.300 = Gauge32: 1
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.9.1.1 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.9.1.5 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.9.1.60 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.9.1.300 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.10.1.1 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.10.1.5 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.10.1.60 = Gauge32: 0
enterprises.1991.1.1.2.11.1.1.4.10.1.300 = Gauge32: 0

Now the index values in this case are the 1,5,9 &10, but these are then followed by a .1 and then the .1,.5,.60 &.300 represent 1,5,60 or 300 second usage.....

Is there a way of using the above 'patch' and the <oid_suffix> that I can get this to work at last ?

Thanks....

Mike
Back to top
cbscpe



Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 15
Location: Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I had the same problem as many in this thread. First I needed a more flexible use of REGEX and second my Indexes are not at the end of the OID.

I opened a feature request and also wrote a patch to allow for several enhancements regarding the issues discussed in this thread.

See the following discussion

[url]
http://forums.cacti.net/about26851.html
[/url]

I added the following functions to SNMP Query Indexed

1. Added a new field <oid_index_filter> which accepts a REGEX to filter only those OID that effectively match (<oid_index_parse> only parses the OIDs but keeps all records returned by the SNMPWALK even if the REGEX does not match). This is useful to filter OIDs to keep only one with the interesting Index.

2. Added a new field <index_parse> which can be used in input and output fields. The result is that instead of joining the content of <oid> and the index it accepts a REGEX in <index_parse> which is then applied to the index and uses <oid> as the replacement string. You can use as many groups you want in the REGEX and using the \1, .. \9 to insert the matched strings at any place in the <oid>, not only the end. My patch has only support for the get method and not for the walk method.

3. Added a new field <string> which can be used in to create an arbitrary text.

The code still uses ereg_replace, I have not really seen any advantage of using preg_replace although it could be done.

Currently we are using these features to pull all G.SHDSL Counters (Near and Far end) with one query. Patches required are attached here.

[url]
http://bugs.cacti.net/view.php?id=1225
[/url]

Peter
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cacti Forum Index -> Feature Requests All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group