REPAIRED: SmokePing Like 1.0

drose12 · Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 31

I thought I'd give a crack at something that was similar to SmokePing. It's not perfect, and please comment if you find any issues with it. Essentially it pings 20 times much like the original. I've made the packet loss show up as a vertical bar instead of just a section of a line. Please note that the ping-latency.pl perl script that should go in /var/www/html/cacti/scripts, takes advantage of a shorter interval time and this may or may not be supported on your platform. I am currently running this on RH EL AS3. Your mileage may vary.

drose12 · Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 31

Of course, here are the .xml file and ping-latency.pl script. I had to add .txt to the script to get it to attach.

Place script in /var/www/html/cacti/scripts

drose12 · Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 31

Here is a look at a zoomed in graph. I used the deviation returned from the ping script to graph the dark smoke...

tamaqua · Joined: 29 Apr 2005 Posts: 7

drose-
Thanks a million times over for posting this. I have been messing with the orig script posted here (smokeping 86c) to get it to look more like the orig. It worked, but when I upgraded to 86f and rrdtool1.2, it started failing. This works great for me. I modded it just a bit, added a new class of loss (1-2% and 3-5% now instead of just 1-5%) and am using fping with more pings so that you can actually get 1-2% loss. I.E. 19/20 pings returned = 5%loss 18/20 = 10% loss, etc. I upped to 40 pings and now able to get 39/40 = 2.5% loss, which matches the first instance. How hard would it be to change the loss return from % to actual ping loss? I.E. actually have 1 packet lost = 1st color, 2 packet lost = 2nd color, etc? It would be nice to reduce my pings back down to 20ish as the ping process takes a long time across many devices.... but I really need the low end loss stats.

Here is my ping-latency.pl -- CAUTION - only use if you know what you are doing, as this amount of pinging and pause time may overwhelm/ or effect the poller, etc in bad ways. CAUTION!

#!/usr/bin/perl

$host = $ARGV[0];
$ping=`/usr/sbin/fping -c 40 -p 130 -i 130 -q $host 2>&1`;
($x, $y) = split (",", $ping);
($xmt,$rcv,$loss) = ($x =~ /(\d+)\/(\d+)\/(\d+)/);
($min,$avg,$max) = ($y =~ /(\d+\.?\d*)\/(\d+\.?\d*)\/(\d+\.?\d*)/);
$dev1 = $avg - $min;
$dev2 = $max - $avg;
$dev = ($dev1 + $dev2)/2;
printf ("min:%.3f avg:%.3f max:%.3f dev:%.3f loss:%.0f", $min, $avg, $max, $dev, $loss);

And, heres an example of the modded graph (without much data on it yet)
And the modded xml.

drose12 · Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 31

spoonman · Cacti User Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 243

Has anyone had issued importing either of these 2 templates?? I'm using cacti vs. d and I get Error: XML: Hash version does not exist when trying to import either 1.0 or 1.1 templates?? Any suggestions??

Thanks

Spoon

TheWitness · Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:16 pm Post subject:

I have created a PHP Script Server version of fping using builtin Cacti modules and the specification in your perl script. This may be much faster than your current perl script. Give it a try. Your existing Data Sources should be 100% compatible.

Use the following link to ss_tping.php as a guide.

TheWitness

TheWitness · Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:17 pm Post subject:

Ok, who wins the battle of the pings:

http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?p=37590#37590

TheWitness

TheWitness · Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:30 am Post subject:

I am thinking of making this the Gold Standard. I would like comments from the Cacti community. Please provide feedback.

Also, if somebody could package the ss_fping.php into a complete "Data Input", "Data Template" and "Graph Template" package, I would appreciate it.

I will be away starting this Sunday for a week and will have no access to the Internet. Heading for the woods...

Thanks,

TheWitness

egarnel · Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:15 am Post subject:

Watch out for bears

TheWitness · Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:07 pm Post subject:

DANGER DANGER DANGER:

I have been working with this template and have found a flaw associated with it or Cacti that will make you unhappy (eventually) if you use it.

It saddens me to say this, because I really like it and cudo's to the author's.

However, there is a problem when this Graph Template is applied to create Graphs. When you do so, the Graphs, although they will function, are damaged internally. If they are edited, say by modifying the graph template, you will likely loose all of your graphs.

I have sent the Exported Graph Template to the Cacti author and major domo ("Ian Berry") in hopes that he can correct the problem.

Till then, buyer beware. Sorry

TheWitness[/b]

drose12 · Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 31

Any more details around this? My graphs appear to be working ok. Perhaps I don't quite understand what part is broken.

spoonman · Cacti User Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 243

I also would like to know has anyonehad problems importing these xml templates?? I get hash errors on 1.0 and the 1.1 templates...

I'm running .8.6d

Thanks

petredaniel · Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 3 Location: pitesti, romania

indeed, sadly, look how my starting graph looks like, in the attachament.
im running :

Latest version installed: 0.8.6f

and rrdtool 1.2.11

TheWitness · Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 5:59 pm Post subject:

I have received an updated template from the Cacti Author, but have not had time to modify for the ss_fping.php program and post to this site. Been I vacation and in the woods with the Boy Scouts, apparently hunting bears

BTB, with the ss_fping.php Script Server add on, the performance does improve significantly depending on how many ping retries you select.

TheWitness