|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2002 2:39 pm Post subject: New Versions of RRDTOOL Are Out |
|
|
www.rrdtool.org
... for most OS Platforms, including WIN32/NT and MacOS
(the new win32 version seems to be working fine with Cacti)
to install the WIN32 Perl shared libraries:
cd \rrdtool-1.0.35.x86distr\perl-shared\
ppm install rrds.ppd |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raX Lead Developer
Joined: 13 Oct 2001 Posts: 2234 Location: Carlisle, PA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2002 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cool...glad to hear it. I just compiled the new version as well and it too appears to work fine. Any new features I have to add support for in cacti?
-Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chemical Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2003 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is there an option in cacti to add "--lower-limit 0" to a rrd graph?
I can set this value in the graph options, but when I look in the source
of the graph on the "graphs" page, the parameter --lower-limit <value> isn't listed there. (Same for upper limit btw). Is this done on purpose?
I'm using cacti 0.68a.
Thanks in advance! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bulek Cacti Pro User
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 852 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2003 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
It depends on autoscale option you are using. If autoscale is on then upper and lower parameters are not passed to rrdtool. I it is autoscale-max then lower limit should be passed to rrdtool. Because of bug in cacti it is not passed and the thread discussing this can be found here: http://www.raxnet.net/board/viewtopic.php?t=893. If you turn autoscale off then both parameters are passed to rrdtool.
- bulek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chemical Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2003 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks
Works now. But hm.. the upper limit should autoscale. I should wait for 0.8, I think.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mic Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2003 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i I did little modification in the code, so --lower-limit = 0 is included with autoscale-max  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Torsten Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2003 5:08 am Post subject: new rrdtool -> filenames longer than 19 letter?????? |
|
|
Hi,
is the filename length restricted (19 letters) by cacti or by rrdtool or mysql-db?
If the rrdtool restrict it, does the new one the same????
cul-Torsten |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bulek Cacti Pro User
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 852 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2003 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
The filename length is not restricted by rrdtool. Restricted to 19 characters is internal data source name.
- bulek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Torsten Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2003 6:07 am Post subject: Re: Internal length restriction |
|
|
Hello,
thanks for info..
Could I change this restriction? Is it fixed in cacti 0.8?
The internal name is made by the external name - if the external name is too long the internal name can conflict with other sources.
Any ideas how to bypass this problem?
Thank you
Torsten |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bulek Cacti Pro User
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 852 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2003 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Normaly it is not a problem. Internal name is unique per each file. This means you can have several rrd files that use the same internal DS name. The only problem are multi data sources rrd files. In cacti internal names are based on data input script output parameter names. As long as your parameters have different characters looking at first 19 of them it is ok.
Anyway it's internal rrdtool restriction and you can't fix it.
- bulek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|