Cacti (home)ForumsDocumentation
Cacti: offical forums and support
It is currently Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:07 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 301 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 10
I have all the graphs working except network and memory. Memory just gives me a Paging option. Is this normal? Traffic for the network card is a dead image.

https://db.tt/8h2wgwgl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 5:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 2:37 pm
Posts: 7
I seem to have an inverse issues to some that I've read - I get the thumbnails generated for queues/transfers, but not the actual graphs. It was working fine on an Ubuntu 12.04 and 0.8.7something version of cacti. Upgraded to 14.04 and 0.8.8b and this is happening. The datasources update, the thumbnails are accurate, but the actual graphs never get created.

I tried on another ubuntu box, fresh install of 14.04 and 0.8.8b. Exact same behavior. Other metrics are fine, only queues/transfers does this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 2:37 pm
Posts: 7
An update, graph debug actually shows the graph. They're simply not being created in the output directory (graphs directory under webroot). Other graphs work fine, thumbnails for these missing graphs are fine.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 9:09 am 
Offline
Cacti User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:25 am
Posts: 85
All,
I have deployed a new Ubuntu 14.04 Cacti Server running 0.8.8c and have not been able to duplicate this issue. Seems as when I have seen something similar to this previously it was a permissions issue on the RRD's in the RRA folder.

_________________
@mrlesmithjr
http://everythingshouldbevirtual.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 2:37 pm
Posts: 7
The RRAs update fine, I wonder if it could be a combo of 14.04 and 0.8.8b? I had this issue on an upgraded server (12.04 with 0.8.7i upgraded to 14.04 with 0.8.8b from repos). Worked fine before, had this issue after. So I built a fresh 14.04 and installed from repos (again, 0.8.8b as that's what Ubuntu has) and it experiences the same issue. I'll try throwing in 0.8.8c to see if that resolves things.

*EDIT*
In the meantime, I threw cacti from Ubuntu repos onto a 12.04 box and these same graphs work like a champ (though I had to find an older version, which was in this thread).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 12:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:53 pm
Posts: 44
OK have a similar issue to what others have reported with the XML's though not uniformed in nature, i.e. some work some don't.

WORKS: SNMP_Informant_Standard - CPU Statistics
WORKS: SNMP_Informant_Standard - Disk Statistics
WORKS: SNMP_Informant_Standard - Objects Statistics

FAILS: SNMP_Informant_Standard - Memory Statistics
Running data query [15].
+ Found type = '3' [SNMP Query].
+ Found data query XML file at '/usr/local/share/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_standard_memory.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ <oid_num_indexes> missing in XML file, 'Index Count Changed' emulated by counting oid_index entries
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.2' Index Count: 0
+ No SNMP data returned

FAILS: SNMP_Informant_Standard - Network Statistics
+ Running data query [16].
+ Found type = '3' [SNMP Query].
+ Found data query XML file at '/usr/local/share/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_standard_network.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ <oid_num_indexes> missing in XML file, 'Index Count Changed' emulated by counting oid_index entries
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1' Index Count: 0
+ No SNMP data returned

Now if I do a snmpwalk FROM my FreeBSD box where Cacti is installed it works fine (using memory as an example using the OID referenced above):

[email protected]:/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs # snmpwalk -m +INFORMANT-STD -v 2c -c STRING target.b.c.d .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.2
INFORMANT-STD::memoryAvailableBytes.0 = Gauge32: 455442432
INFORMANT-STD::memoryAvailableKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 105302368
INFORMANT-STD::memoryAvailableMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 102834
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCommittedBytes.0 = Gauge32: 3840229376
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCacheBytes.0 = Gauge32: 97828864
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCacheBytesPeak.0 = Gauge32: 203575296
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPageFaultsPerSec.0 = Gauge32: 645
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPagesInputPerSec.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPagesOutputPerSec.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPagesPerSec.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolNonpagedBytes.0 = Gauge32: 1086558208
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolPagedBytes.0 = Gauge32: 254464000
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolPagedResidentBytes.0 = Gauge32: 238940160
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCacheResidentBytes.0 = Gauge32: 97828864
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCodeResidentBytes.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCodeTotalBytes.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemDriverResidentBytes.0 = Gauge32: 17625088
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemDriverTotalBytes.0 = Gauge32: 12283904
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCommittedKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 28916048
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCacheKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 95536
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCacheKBytesPeak.0 = Gauge32: 198804
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolNonpagedKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 1061092
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolPagedKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 248500
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolPagedResidentKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 233340
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCacheResidentKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 95536
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCodeResidentKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCodeTotalKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemDriverResidentKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 17212
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemDriverTotalKBytes.0 = Gauge32: 11996
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCommittedMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 28238
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCacheMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 93
INFORMANT-STD::memoryCacheMBytesPeak.0 = Gauge32: 194
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolNonpagedMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 1036
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolPagedMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 242
INFORMANT-STD::memoryPoolPagedResidentMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 227
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCacheResidentMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 93
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCodeResidentMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemCodeTotalMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 0
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemDriverResidentMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 16
INFORMANT-STD::memorySystemDriverTotalMBytes.0 = Gauge32: 11

also if I do that w/ the MID the OID's raw are:

SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.1.0 = Gauge32: 431783936
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 105279264
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 102811
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.4.0 = Gauge32: 3850579968
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.5.0 = Gauge32: 101634048
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.6.0 = Gauge32: 203575296
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.7.0 = Gauge32: 357
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.8.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.9.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.10.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.11.0 = Gauge32: 1086218240
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.12.0 = Gauge32: 254464000
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.13.0 = Gauge32: 238919680
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.14.0 = Gauge32: 101634048
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.15.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.16.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.17.0 = Gauge32: 17625088
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.18.0 = Gauge32: 12283904
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.19.0 = Gauge32: 28926160
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.20.0 = Gauge32: 99252
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.21.0 = Gauge32: 198804
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.22.0 = Gauge32: 1060760
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.23.0 = Gauge32: 248500
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.24.0 = Gauge32: 233320
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.25.0 = Gauge32: 99252
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.26.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.27.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.28.0 = Gauge32: 17212
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.29.0 = Gauge32: 11996
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.30.0 = Gauge32: 28248
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.31.0 = Gauge32: 96
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.32.0 = Gauge32: 194
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.33.0 = Gauge32: 1035
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.34.0 = Gauge32: 242
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.35.0 = Gauge32: 227
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.36.0 = Gauge32: 96
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.37.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.38.0 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.39.0 = Gauge32: 16
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.2.40.0 = Gauge32: 11

I don't think it's a permissions problem as the other three work just fine and perms are identical. I did wonder if an issue mentioned in another post with Juniper ( Can't get SNMP index values with XML query, but snmpwalk can ) though have my doubts as CPU pulls a quantity / higher index (I have 40 cores, query works just fine so as memory index way lower). No errors on import and the XML templates I pulled were right off a fresh git sync (and parsed by according to verbose debug)

System Info [Server]

FreeBSD 10.1 (uname -a: FreeBSD cacti.b.c.d 10.1-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue Apr 7 15:37:20 HST 2015 [email protected]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64)
Cacti 0.8.8c ( pkg info | grep cacti : cacti-0.8.8c_1)

System Info [ Target ]
Windows 2012 R2 DataCenter
Informant Std 1.7 [free version]

EDIT: Also just to make sure it wasn't a corruption issue, I hashed the git hub version off the net ( https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mrles ... memory.xml ) against the local version both synced AND in the cacti/resources folder, all three identical hashes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 1:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 1:19 am
Posts: 1
Hi!

I use Cacti Version 0.8.8c and
** SNMP Informant Standard Metrics for Windows Devices ** v14 Release 08/16/2013
Created by @mrlesmithjr
http://everythingshouldbevirtual.com

Localized version windows(xp,7,2008,2012) adds Russian characters in the name of the network interface. Because of this, the data returned by snmp-informant as follows:

Verbose query get

+ Running data query [16].
+ Found type = '3' [SNMP Query].
+ Found data query XML file at '/home/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/snmp_informant_standard_network.xml'
+ XML file parsed ok.
+ <oid_num_indexes> missing in XML file, 'Index Count Changed' emulated by counting oid_index entries
+ Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1' Index Count: 1
+ Index found at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1.58.4294967248.4294967201.4294967248.4294967221.4294967249.4294967170.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967218.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967221.32.4294967248.4294967231.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967220.4294967248.4294967226.4294967248.4294967227.4294967249.4294967182.4294967249.4294967175.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967229.4294967248.4294967224.4294967248.4294967221.32.73.110.116.101.108.91.82.93.32.80.82.79.95.49.48.48.48.32.77.84' value: 'D0:A1:D0:B5:D1:82:D0:B5:D0:B2:D0:BE:D0:B5:20:D0:BF:D0:BE:D0:B4:D0:BA:D0:BB:D1:8E:D1:87:D0:B5:D0:BD:D0:B8:D0:B5:20:49:6E:74:65:6C:5B:52:5D:20:50:52:4F:5F:31:30:30:30:20:4D:54'
+ index_parse at OID: '1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1.58.4294967248.4294967201.4294967248.4294967221.4294967249.4294967170.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967218.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967221.32.4294967248.4294967231.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967220.4294967248.4294967226.4294967248.4294967227.4294967249.4294967182.4294967249.4294967175.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967229.4294967248.4294967224.4294967248.4294967221.32.73.110.116.101.108.91.82.93.32.80.82.79.95.49.48.48.48.32.77.84' results: '58.4294967248.4294967201.4294967248.4294967221.4294967249.4294967170.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967218.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967221.32.4294967248.4294967231.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967220.4294967248.4294967226.4294967248.4294967227.4294967249.4294967182.4294967249.4294967175.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967229.4294967248.4294967224.4294967248.4294967221.32.73.110.116.101.108.91.82.93.32.80.82.79.95.49.48.48.48.32.77.84'
+ Located input field 'netInstance' [walk]
+ Executing SNMP walk for data @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1'
+ Found item [netInstance='D0:A1:D0:B5:D1:82:D0:B5:D0:B2:D0:BE:D0:B5:20:D0:BF:D0:BE:D0:B4:D0:BA:D0:BB:D1:8E:D1:87:D0:B5:D0:BD:D0:B8:D0:B5:20:49:6E:74:65:6C:5B:52:5D:20:50:52:4F:5F:31:30:30:30:20:4D:54'] index: 58.4294967248.4294967201.4294967248.4294967221.4294967249.4294967170.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967218.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967221.32.4294967248.4294967231.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967220.4294967248.4294967226.4294967248.4294967227.4294967249.4294967182.4294967249.4294967175.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967229.4294967248.4294967224.4294967248.4294967221.32.73.110.116.101.108.91.82.93.32.80.82.79.95.49.48.48.48.32.77.84 [from value]

snmpwalk return this data

[[email protected] ~]# snmpwalk -v2c -c public 10.10.10.22 .1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9600.1.1.3.1.1.58.4294967248.4294967201.4294967248.4294967221.4294967249.4294967170.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967218.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967221.32.4294967248.4294967231.4294967248.4294967230.4294967248.4294967220.4294967248.4294967226.4294967248.4294967227.4294967249.4294967182.4294967249.4294967175.4294967248.4294967221.4294967248.4294967229.4294967248.4294967224.4294967248.4294967221.32.73.110.116.101.108.91.82.93.32.80.82.79.95.49.48.48.48.32.77.84 = Hex-STRING: D0 A1 D0 B5 D1 82 D0 B5 D0 B2 D0 BE D0 B5 20 D0
BF D0 BE D0 B4 D0 BA D0 BB D1 8E D1 87 D0 B5 D0
BD D0 B8 D0 B5 20 49 6E 74 65 6C 5B 52 5D 20 50
52 4F 5F 31 30 30 30 20 4D 54

the length of the field turns out more snmp_index described in the table and the graphics are not built.

CREATE TABLE `data_local` (
...
`snmp_index` VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
...

As I understand it, the problem is that the cacti are not handled correctly value "Hex-STRING:" in request OID value

<oid_index>.1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.3.1.1</oid_index>
<oid_index_parse>OID/REGEXP:.*\.1\.(.*)$</oid_index_parse>

I rummaged all Internet, but did not find the solution to this problem. Really nobody faced? Maybe there is some nice solution for this problem?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:32 am
Posts: 6
Import Error: XML parse error in Version 0.8.8f


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:53 pm
Posts: 44
erebusodora: WFM with 0.8.8f (well mostly, still have some odd issues with the network checks but I'm still investigating as might be on my side)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 1:07 pm
Posts: 13
I've tried to follow the instructions to get this working as well.

Running on Win7.
Cacti 0.8.7c
Installed SNMP on Win7; this is working fine.
Installed latest free Informant (v1.7 std)
Downloaded Informant templates v13,12,11,10,9 etc..

Trying to import template(s), I get "Error: XML: Hash version does not exist." not matter which version I try to import...

_________________
CactiEZ v0.7


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 2:37 pm
Posts: 7
I know it's been a year since I posted to this thread, but it's a renewed subject for me. To expand upon my previous issues, I only have missing graph files (thumbnails are good) when using the export function. I turned on verbose logging, and it showed as successful. The only way I can make it actually work is to give www-data a valid shell, su to it, and run the graph generation command manually. Doing so via cron creates only the thumbnails.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:17 am
Posts: 3
Image
I am new on cacti.
please,somebody could tell me what unit is used for laft numbers on Y-axis in this grafic ,like Kbps or anything else..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 12:34 am
Posts: 4
Hi All,

I hope you are all well.

Is it possible with SNMP-INFORMANT to graph a Windows NIC Team interface?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:41 pm
Posts: 19
are there any news to get the template correctly imported into the latest 0.8.8 cacti version?

Get the XML parse error, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WinXP-Win8, Win2000-Server 2012 x32/x64 Templates
PostPosted: Tue May 09, 2017 10:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:53 pm
Posts: 44
Dylan: It works though not sure it does with the free version.

Axel: Works fine wih 1.0.3


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 301 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group